Lolita IS Dying, let's talk about it.
Russ Rector
|
The Rectory
|
|
| Return to Website | ||
 First |
 Prev |
 Reply |
 Home |
Next  |
Last  |
| Viewing Page 1 of 1 (Total Posts: 16) |
| Author | Comment |
|
Alyssa
Aug 15, 08 - 5:42 PM |
PETA and SeaWorld
Russ did you see that PETA wants to buy a SeaWorld park and rehab all the animals in ocean pens? |
|
Anon
Aug 15th, 2008 - 6:05 PM |
Re: PETA and SeaWorld
Its ridiculous and will not happen. |
Russ Rector
Aug 15th, 2008 - 6:37 PM |
Re: PETA and SeaWorld
INGRID IS ENTERTAINING IF NOTHING ELSE! |
|
Manon
Aug 16th, 2008 - 5:15 AM |
Re: PETA and SeaWorld
http://www.peta.org/MC/NewsItem.asp?id=11822 IT'S TRUE. BUT I HIGHLY DOUBT THIS WILL WORK, THERE IS ALMOST NO CHANCE BUT WE CAN ALWAYS TRY...... THE ONE HOLDING SW NOW ISN'T SOMEONE WHO IS INTO MARINE PARKS NOW, RIGHT? SO WHY WOULD IT BOTHER HIM WHO HE SOLD IT TO? |
|
Anon2
Aug 16th, 2008 - 5:38 AM |
Re: PETA and SeaWorld
WHAT A JOKE ! PETA is going to spend billions to buy seaworld and then what about the costs to rehabilitate all those whales , this is the most ridiculous idea ever ! and they actually think its possible ! |
|
Manon
Aug 16th, 2008 - 5:53 AM |
Re: PETA and SeaWorld
MY ENGLISH ISN'T THE BEST, BUT AS FAR AS I UNDERSTOOD FROM THE TEXT, A DONOR OFFERS TO PAY FOR IT. SO IT WON'T BE PETA THEIRSELFS TO ACTUALLY BUY SW RIGHT? |
|
Orca
Aug 16th, 2008 - 12:27 PM |
Re: PETA and SeaWorld
PETA is rediculous. If not stupid. Government regulations already would be one of several barriers preventing them from tossing hundreds of animals into the ocean. And the cost? Get real. It was 60 BILLION dollars to free Keiko. Imagine the cost for "freeing" SeaWorld's nearly-200 cetaceans, most of which were BORN IN CAPTIVITY. |
|
original random person
Aug 16th, 2008 - 3:59 PM |
Re: PETA and SeaWorld
PETA more than likely will never get SW. If it did theyd probably kill any animal that cant live without humans,thats what they do to most of the dogs that are sent to them,they're killed. |
|
Manon
Aug 17th, 2008 - 7:27 AM |
Re: PETA and SeaWorld
WHAT DO YOU MEAN, WITH THE DOGS? COULD YOU EXPLAIN? |
|
Russ Rector
Aug 17th, 2008 - 11:35 AM |
Re: PETA and SeaWorld
AB IS BSILING ON SW. AB HAS BEEN LOOKING TO DUMP SW WITHOUT LOOKING LIKE IT. AB FAMILY IS TIRED OF THE BAD PRESS AND CONTRIVERSY GENERATED BY SW. AB COULD HAVE SOLD THE BEER BRAND AND KEPT BUSCH ENTERTAINMENT...THEY DIDNT! THEY ARE BAILING OUT!$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ |
|
w/e
Aug 21st, 2008 - 6:33 AM |
Re: PETA and SeaWorld
this wont happen it would be stupid for peta to buy the park the animals whom were born and brought up in captivity would not know how to live without humans and they would die. The animals with in the ab parks are more then well taken care of this is just crazy. Also in return to the comment on the ab company bailing nothing officaly has been said that the busch family will not try to buy the parks.... |
|
Russ Rector
Aug 21st, 2008 - 6:34 AM |
Re: PETA and SeaWorld
they are BAILING!!!$$$!!!$$$ |
|
ProudOrcaWarrior
Aug 22nd, 2008 - 6:12 PM |
Re: PETA and SeaWorld
Why doesn't PETA buy the MSQ instead? The conditions are MUCH crueler. |
|
Neveah
Aug 22nd, 2008 - 7:14 PM |
Re: PETA and SeaWorld
MSQ isn't for sale and isn't as nationally recognized. More people would react to 'freeing shamu' then to 'freeing lolita'. You gotta always keep the publicity angle in mind.. |
|
Manon
Sep 20th, 2008 - 8:16 AM |
Re: PETA and SeaWorld
HERTZ WOULD NEVER NEVER NEVER SELL MSQ TO ANT-CAPTIVITY PEOPLE. |
|
Russ Rector
Sep 20th, 2008 - 10:27 AM |
Re: PETA and SeaWorld
YOU GOT THAT RIGHT!!!!!! |
| First |
Prev |
Reply |
Home |
Next |
Last |
bravenet.com